Elliott Management Secures Crucial Victory in Phillips 66 Proxy Battle as ISS Endorses All Board Nominees

Activist investor Elliott Management has gained a pivotal advantage in its proxy battle with Phillips 66 after Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), the influential proxy advisory firm, endorsed all four of Elliott’s board nominees. The May 21 shareholder vote could dramatically alter the oil refiner’s leadership and strategic direction, intensifying pressure on Phillips 66 to improve lagging financial performance. This endorsement marks a turning point in Elliott’s months-long campaign to overhaul the company’s governance and operations.

Why ISS Support Matters in the Proxy Fight

ISS recommendations carry substantial weight with institutional investors, who often rely on the firm’s guidance when voting in contentious proxy battles. Analysts estimate ISS influences approximately 25% of shareholder votes at S&P 500 companies. Their endorsement of Elliott’s full slate suggests growing dissatisfaction with Phillips 66’s current trajectory.

“The ISS recommendation is a watershed moment,” said energy sector analyst Rebecca Chen of Bernstein Research. “When you see this level of support for an activist’s entire slate, it typically signals that shareholders want sweeping changes rather than incremental adjustments.”

Key factors behind ISS’s decision include:

• Phillips 66’s 18% total shareholder return over three years, trailing peers like Marathon Petroleum (42%) and Valero Energy (39%)
• Consistent underperformance in refining margins and chemical segment profitability
• Concerns about capital allocation and cost management

Elliott’s Case for Change at Phillips 66

Elliott Management, which holds a $1 billion stake in Phillips 66, launched its campaign in December 2023, arguing the company could unlock $15-20 billion in shareholder value through operational improvements and strategic realignment. The hedge fund proposes:

• Refocusing on core refining operations with measurable efficiency targets
• Spinning off non-core assets including certain chemical and midstream businesses
• Implementing rigorous cost controls to improve margins by $1 billion annually
• Adding directors with refining and turnaround expertise

“Phillips 66 has all the pieces to be an industry leader but has consistently failed to execute,” said Elliott senior portfolio manager John Pike in a recent investor presentation. “Our nominees bring the operational discipline and sector-specific experience needed to close this performance gap.”

Phillips 66’s Defense of Current Strategy

The Houston-based company maintains its existing leadership team and strategic plan can deliver superior returns. CEO Mark Lashier has highlighted recent progress, including:

• Projected $1.4 billion in cost savings by 2024 through operational improvements
• Successful integration of the DCP Midstream acquisition
• Advancement of renewable fuels initiatives positioning the company for energy transition

“We’ve made substantial strides in refining reliability, commercial execution, and cost management,” Lashier stated in the company’s latest earnings call. “Our board has the right mix of skills and experience to oversee this transformation.”

Corporate governance experts note the ISS recommendation doesn’t guarantee Elliott’s victory but significantly shifts momentum. “This puts Phillips 66 in a defensive position,” explained Harvard Law School professor Lucian Bebchuk. “They’ll need to demonstrate why maintaining the status quo better serves shareholders than Elliott’s proposed changes.”

Market Reaction and Investor Sentiment

The news triggered a 3.2% rise in Phillips 66’s stock price, reflecting investor optimism about potential changes. Options trading volume surged to 2.5 times the 30-day average, with notable activity in bullish call options.

Not all shareholders appear convinced, however. “While Elliott makes valid points about operational improvements, we’re cautious about radical portfolio changes during energy market volatility,” commented Sarah Kim, portfolio manager at Wellington Management, which holds a 2.1% stake.

Recent 13F filings reveal mixed positioning among major institutional investors:

• Vanguard increased its position by 1.2 million shares in Q1 2024
• State Street reduced its holdings by 850,000 shares
• New activist firm Engine Capital disclosed a 0.6% stake supporting Elliott’s campaign

What Comes Next in the Proxy Contest

With the May 21 annual meeting approaching, both sides are intensifying their campaigns:

• Elliott plans investor meetings emphasizing ISS’s endorsement and refining turnaround case studies
• Phillips 66 scheduled plant tours to demonstrate operational improvements to major shareholders
• Both parties filed supplemental proxy materials with the SEC this week

The outcome may hinge on votes from index funds and pension managers. BlackRock, which holds 8.3% of shares, hasn’t publicly disclosed its voting intentions but historically supports management in 70% of proxy contests.

Broader Implications for Energy Sector Activism

This proxy battle reflects growing investor impatience with underperforming energy companies. According to Lazard data, energy sector activist campaigns increased 27% year-over-year in 2023, with a 65% success rate in securing board representation.

“The Phillips 66 situation exemplifies how activists are targeting energy companies that haven’t adapted to new margin realities,” noted Paul Sankey of Sankey Research. “Investors increasingly view operational excellence as non-negotiable in this sector.”

Regardless of the May 21 outcome, the contest has already forced Phillips 66 to accelerate cost-cutting measures and operational reviews—a partial victory for Elliott even before the shareholder vote.

For investors tracking this developing story: Monitor SEC filings for additional proxy materials and watch for updated position disclosures from major institutional holders ahead of the decisive vote.

See more Business Focus Insider Team